prodvisor.
Prodvisor is built for small business owners, entrepreneurs, and service providers who lack dedicated marketing and sales expertise. Many struggle to define their target audience, communicate their product's value, understand customer objections, and identify why conversations fail to turn into sales. Customer feedback is often scattered across messages, leaving business owners to make decisions based on assumptions rather than evidence. Prodvisor addresses this by turning business information and customer conversations into personalized, actionable growth recommendations.
Preliminary score
- Value for the user18.0 / 25
A specific problem and a clear outcome from solving it.
- Prototype and use of AI22.0 / 30
A working core scenario, and what AI actually contributes to the result.
- Quality testing14.5 / 20
Tests, examples of failures, and comparison with the current approach.
- Feasibility9.0 / 15
Data requirements, running costs and a clear next step.
- Originality5.5 / 10
A meaningful difference from common solutions.
What the judges wrote
- Claude Opus 5.5Preliminary68/100
- Strengths
- Your evaluation is unusually honest and specific: 15 manually labelled Azerbaijani dialogues, per-dimension accuracy, objection precision and recall (100%/50%), an evidence-matching count (40/46), latency, and a prompt-injection case, all shown on an in-app test screen. Your prototype covers a coherent flow, from Business DNA onboarding to a context-aware advisor, inbox analysis that cites the source message, and conversion of findings into an action plan. The synthetic example of a customer asking about delivery and being answered on price makes the pain concrete. You also mark AI-suggested profile data as unverified, which is a thoughtful design touch.
- To improve
- Your outcome is still asserted: run even a small timed comparison against manual review, or a pilot with one real business, to show minutes saved or replies improved. Fifteen synthetic dialogues is a thin base. Expand to real, consented chats and focus on objection recall, which you correctly name as your main weakness. Add estimated Gemini cost per analysed conversation so the 19/49 AZN tiers can be checked against running costs. Your campaign planner and generic advisor dilute the core; tightening the story around the conversation-analysis workflow would make it more distinctive.
- GPT-6 AstraPreliminary70/100
- Strengths
- Your prototype addresses a concrete small-business problem by connecting customer conversations, persistent business context, and follow-up actions. Your interface distinguishes unverified profile suggestions and leaves missing delivery details for the seller to clarify rather than inventing them. Your 15-case evaluation reports meaningful weaknesses—including 50% objection recall and incomplete evidence matching—and clearly separates functional results from unmeasured sales impact.
- To improve
- Your next validation should use consented real business conversations and measure review time and missed issues against manual review and a general-purpose AI baseline. Expand your labeled tests around missed objections, ambiguous sales stages, and evidence mismatches, publishing expected versus actual outputs for representative failures. Your feasibility plan should quantify API and hosting costs at the proposed subscription tiers and specify consent, retention, and account-isolation safeguards before moving beyond localStorage.
The team
Ilkin Alizada
developer
Nurkhan Guliyev
designer
Ilaza Javadova
designer
Matin GafarovLead
product