EduTrack ai
EduTrackAI - a platform created for students and teachers, while not forgetting parents. Teachers will create online classes and upload quizzes to that class, with a deadline for students to finish the quiz on time. Parents will be able to see their children's performance, both on individual quizzes and overall average. AI is not left out either - each student will be able to ask AI model to explain the question. Students, teachers and parents will be able to see past quizzes, found the topics they have difficulties, and improve themselves on that topics.
Preliminary score
- Value for the user13.5 / 25
A specific problem and a clear outcome from solving it.
- Prototype and use of AI14.5 / 30
A working core scenario, and what AI actually contributes to the result.
- Quality testing4.5 / 20
Tests, examples of failures, and comparison with the current approach.
- Feasibility4.5 / 15
Data requirements, running costs and a clear next step.
- Originality3.0 / 10
A meaningful difference from common solutions.
What the judges wrote
- GPT-6 AstraPreliminary43/100
- Strengths
- Your platform connects a clear assessment workflow across teachers, students and parents rather than serving only one role. Your reported checks cover account creation, teacher-to-student quiz distribution and parent access to results, providing initial evidence of that connection. Your proposed AI mistake explanations address the useful gap between receiving a score and understanding an error.
- To improve
- Your next demonstration should show a complete quiz attempt, the exact AI explanation of a wrong answer, and the resulting teacher and parent views. Your testing should cover explanation accuracy, scoring and deadline edge cases, and unauthorized access to children's records, while comparing teacher feedback time or student understanding against the current approach. Your feasibility plan should identify the exact deployed model, estimate cost per completed quiz, and define a realistic classroom pilot with an adoption metric.
- Claude Opus 5.5Preliminary37/100
- Strengths
- Your prototype covers three roles end to end: teachers publish timed quizzes, students take them with automatic scoring, and parents link a child by code to see averages and trends. Using Supabase with row-level security, role-based sign-up and English/Azerbaijani/Russian localisation makes it look like a usable product. Having a deployed demo suggests the core flow actually runs.
- To improve
- AI is a side feature. The platform would work almost the same without it, so show concrete examples of the mistake explanations, including cases where the model got an explanation wrong. Your testing only confirms that sign-up and quiz visibility work. Try the AI explanations on a set of real questions, record accuracy and failures, and compare against how teachers grade and give feedback today. Name a specific user and a measurable outcome, such as teacher hours saved or score improvement after explanations, and estimate API costs per student along with a pilot plan for a real school.
The team
Coşqun Nəcəfli
developer
Eldar ŞirəliyevLead
product
Emin Vəliyev
developer